Cookie preferences

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better tailor the website to your preferences. Below you can indicate your cookie preferences:

Essential cookies are cookies that are necessary for the correct functioning of the website (e.g., to avoid overload on the website, keeping it functional and accessible). These cookies can be placed without your consent.

Functional cookies are cookies that are necessary to improve your browsing experience or to provide a functionality explicitly requested by you (e.g. remembering your settings). These cookies can also be placed without your consent.

Analytical cookies are cookies that collect information about how you use the website to improve search engine hits and the functioning of the website (e.g. we see how visitors move around the website when they are using it to ensure that visitors find what they are looking for easily). These cookies are only placed if you have given your consent.

For more information about cookies and the list of cookies used on this website, see our Cookie Statement.

Distribution Law Center Yearly Update on Verticals – The recordings, Q&A document and slides from the 10 October 2024 seminar are now available online. 


19 December 2023
0
Belgian Competition Authority fines manufacturer of cookware for imposing resale prices on its distributors

The Belgian Competition Authority (‘BCA’) has imposed a fine of 490,112 EUR on Le Creuset Benelux (‘Le Creuset’) for implementing a policy of vertical price fixing (also known as resale price maintenance or ‘RPM’) towards its distributors.

The fine was issued as part of a settlement decision, in which Le Creuset admitted its involvement in the infringement and accepted the terms proposed by the BCA.
 

The infringement

The infringement, which lasted for 6.5 years, consisted of a series of practices whereby the recommended resale prices that Le Creuset provided to its distributors in fact constituted fixed resale prices. Indeed, the resale prices communicated by Le Creuset to its distributors were anything but non-binding, as Le Creuset ensured that its distributors complied with its pricing policy by applying pressure – and sometimes even sanctions –when distributors failed to do so.

Le Creuset also supervised the promotional activities of its distributors and provided them with information about their competitors, especially about price changes that they had made or planned.

The imposition of resale prices is considered a clear violation of Article IV.1, §1 of the Belgian Code of Economic Law and Article 101, §1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which prohibit anti-competitive agreements between undertakings.
 

Commentary

It has been some time since the BCA imposed a fine for RPM. However, this decision shows that the BCA is not losing sight of such infringements, and that – once in the competition authority's sights – there are few excuses for companies engaging in such behaviour. The BCA’s decision will be published shortly, which will give us more insight into the exact content of the infringement as well as the commitments accepted by Le Creuset.


Save, download or share this article


Stay updated

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

More articles about Belgium

SEE MORE

Comment on this article

Sign in to post comments

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

The DLC’s Legal notice applies. contrast BV will process your data in accordance with the Privacy notice.