Cookie preferences

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better tailor the website to your preferences. Below you can indicate your cookie preferences:

Essential cookies are cookies that are necessary for the correct functioning of the website (e.g., to avoid overload on the website, keeping it functional and accessible). These cookies can be placed without your consent.

Functional cookies are cookies that are necessary to improve your browsing experience or to provide a functionality explicitly requested by you (e.g. remembering your settings). These cookies can also be placed without your consent.

Analytical cookies are cookies that collect information about how you use the website to improve search engine hits and the functioning of the website (e.g. we see how visitors move around the website when they are using it to ensure that visitors find what they are looking for easily). These cookies are only placed if you have given your consent.

For more information about cookies and the list of cookies used on this website, see our Cookie Statement.

Check out the video uploads of all four panel sessions of our first Virtual VBER Event of 6 October 2022!


23 January 2023
0
Belgian Competition Authority reimposes fine on Caudalie for vertical restraints

Following the annulment of the Belgian Competition Authority’s (‘BCA’) decision by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Distribution Law Center expected – given the level of the fine imposed and the BCA’s focus on resale price maintenance (‘RPM’) infringements – that the BCA would continue to pursue the matter. And now it appears that this is the case.

In its decision of 18 January 2023, the BCA reimposes the fine of  0.86 million EUR on Caudalie. Although the publication of the official decision is still awaited, it can be implicitly inferred from the level of the fine that was reimposed that the BMA confirmed its earlier decision, but, in doing so, rectified the procedural point regarding the commitments made by Caudalie. The Brussels Court of Appeal had previously ruled that the acceptance of the proposed commitments is contradictory and incompatible with the finding of an infringement and its punishment by a fine.

Keep an eye on the news page of the Distribution Law Center to read a more detailed analysis once the official decision is published.


Save, download or share this article


Stay updated

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

More articles about Belgium

SEE MORE

Comment on this article

Sign in to post comments

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

The DLC’s Legal notice applies. contrast BV will process your data in accordance with the Privacy notice.