Cookie preferences

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better tailor the website to your preferences. Below you can indicate your cookie preferences:

Essential cookies are cookies that are necessary for the correct functioning of the website (e.g., to avoid overload on the website, keeping it functional and accessible). These cookies can be placed without your consent.

Functional cookies are cookies that are necessary to improve your browsing experience or to provide a functionality explicitly requested by you (e.g. remembering your settings). These cookies can also be placed without your consent.

Analytical cookies are cookies that collect information about how you use the website to improve search engine hits and the functioning of the website (e.g. we see how visitors move around the website when they are using it to ensure that visitors find what they are looking for easily). These cookies are only placed if you have given your consent.

For more information about cookies and the list of cookies used on this website, see our Cookie Statement.

16 January 2023
Polish Competition Authority fines Karcher for a long-standing price fixing agreement


On 11 January 2023, the Polish Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (‘UOKiK’, the Polish Competition Authority) announced that it imposed a fine amounting to 26 million PLN (ca. 5.5 million EUR) on Karcher sp. z o.o., an undertaking operating in Poland and member of a capital group manufacturing cleaning equipment. UOKiK found that Karcher set minimum and fixed resale prices of its products with its distributors.  

Prohibited practice

The infringement started as early as at the end of the 1990s. Karcher's contracts with distributors included provisions according to which distributors had the right to set resale prices only on terms determined by Karcher. Distributors selling products at lower prices were sanctioned – Karcher revoked rebates, deprived distributors of marketing support, and in extreme cases, terminated distribution agreements.

Leniency programme

The fine imposed on Karcher would have been significantly higher, had the company not benefited from the leniency programme. Karcher filed a leniency application and cooperated with UOKiK during the investigation, providing additional information and evidence. Karcher was not granted full immunity, as it had encouraged other undertakings to participate in the agreement, and the evidence in UOKiK’s possession would have allowed UOKiK to launch antitrust proceedings even in the absence of the leniency application.  

Possible next steps

Karcher may now challenge UOKiK’s decision before the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection in Warsaw.

Save, download or share this article

Stay updated

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

More articles about Poland


Comment on this article

Sign in to post comments

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

The DLC’s Legal notice applies. contrast BV will process your data in accordance with the Privacy notice.