Cookie preferences

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better tailor the website to your preferences. Below you can indicate your cookie preferences:

Essential cookies are cookies that are necessary for the correct functioning of the website (e.g., to avoid overload on the website, keeping it functional and accessible). These cookies can be placed without your consent.

Functional cookies are cookies that are necessary to improve your browsing experience or to provide a functionality explicitly requested by you (e.g. remembering your settings). These cookies can also be placed without your consent.

Analytical cookies are cookies that collect information about how you use the website to improve search engine hits and the functioning of the website (e.g. we see how visitors move around the website when they are using it to ensure that visitors find what they are looking for easily). These cookies are only placed if you have given your consent.

For more information about cookies and the list of cookies used on this website, see our Cookie Statement.

Check out the video uploads of all four panel sessions of our first Virtual VBER Event of 6 October 2022!


2 November 2022
0
Decision in Garland imposing a record fine for RPM essentially upheld by the chairman of the Czech Competition Authority

Expected development

In January, the Czech Competition Authority (the “CCA”) imposed a record fine of CZK 96.75m (EUR 3.95m) on Garland – a garden equipment distributor – for retail price maintenance (“RPM”). Garland brought an appeal to the Chairman of the CCA, who issued his decision at the end of October. As we had expected after the first instance decision, no substantial changes were made by the Chairman. However, the fine was only slightly reduced to CZK 95.46m (EUR 3.90m) because of an incorrect definition of the duration of the infringement in the original decision.
 

Commentary

This case marks a continuation in the CCA’s practice of imposing high fines based on its relatively new Guidelines for Setting Fines to which we have referred before. The CCA argues that fines must be severe enough to deter undertakings from violating competition law. We consider these guidelines inappropriate and too strict as they may result in vertical agreements being fined more severely than cartels. In addition, it will be very interesting to see whether Garland will take advantage of a new development that might have an impact on the assessment of RPM cases.


Save, download or share this article


Stay updated

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

More articles about Czech Republic

SEE MORE

Comment on this article

Sign in to post comments

Subscribe for free and get notified on the latest articles, documentation and publications.

The DLC’s Legal notice applies. contrast BV will process your data in accordance with the Privacy notice.