Distribution Law Center: Search

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better tailor the website to your preferences. Below you can indicate your cookie preferences:

Essential cookies are cookies that are necessary for the correct functioning of the website (e.g., to avoid overload on the website, keeping it functional and accessible). These cookies can be placed without your consent.

Functional cookies are cookies that are necessary to improve your browsing experience or to provide a functionality explicitly requested by you (e.g. remembering your settings). These cookies can also be placed without your consent.

Analytical cookies are cookies that collect information about how you use the website to improve search engine hits and the functioning of the website (e.g. we see how visitors move around the website when they are using it to ensure that visitors find what they are looking for easily). These cookies are only placed if you have given your consent.

For more information about cookies and the list of cookies used on this website, see our Cookie Statement.

Cookie preferences

Type search term(s) and press enter

51 MATCHES

Belgian court annuls Caudalie’s fine for RPM

Distribution Law Center Countdown II - Overview of distribution systems

The French Competition Authority dismisses the case against Samsung for vertical practices with its authorized distributors

Croatian Competition Authority fines the supplier for prohibited vertical agreement

Hellenic Competition Commission carries out unannounced inspections in the cosmetics and personal care sector and in the eyewear sector

Croatian Competition Authority fines the supplier for prohibited vertical agreement

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

German Competition Authority acts against non-compete obligation in a selective distribution system

Hellenic Competition Commission accepts commitments against concerns about restriction of parallel trade and cross-supplies between authorised distributors in the cosmetic sector

Béguelin Import (22/71)

Coty Germany (C-230/16)

L’Oréal (31/80)

AEG v. Commission (107/82)

Metro v. Commission (26/76)

Leclerc v. Commission (T-19/92)

Vichy v. Commission (T-19/91)

Ford v. Commission (interim measures) (228/82 and 229/82)

Leclerc v. Commission (T-88/92)

Javico (C-306/96)

Auto 24 (C-158/11)

Nuclear Laser Medicine / Innogenetics (C.05.0290.N)

Guess (AT.40428)

Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique (C-439/09)

Denon & Marantz (AT.40469)

Asus (AT.40465)

Philips (AT.40181)

Batavus v Vriend’s Tweewielercentrum (10/00372)

Koninklijke Auping v Beverslaap (12/01625)

Action Sport v Nike (200.231.764/01)

Liebherr

Porsche-Tuning II (KZR 35/20)

Roma Pizza (639/2017)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Selective distribution and e-commerce: state of play after the Coty case

Selective distribution: Rejection of Repairer Inconsistent with the Competition Rules

Review of selective distribution. Does Nike walk alongside its shoes?

Exclusive and selective distribution: variants on the same theme?

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XII - Active sales restrictions (exclusivity condition)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

Virtual VBER Event - Everything you need to know about 1 year VBER

Belgian court annuls Caudalie’s fine for RPM

Distribution Law Center Countdown II - Overview of distribution systems

The French Competition Authority dismisses the case against Samsung for vertical practices with its authorized distributors

Croatian Competition Authority fines the supplier for prohibited vertical agreement

Hellenic Competition Commission carries out unannounced inspections in the cosmetics and personal care sector and in the eyewear sector

Croatian Competition Authority fines the supplier for prohibited vertical agreement

Distribution Law Center Countdown XIX - Selective distribution

Distribution Law Center Countdown XX - Selective distribution (Reverse protection)

German Competition Authority acts against non-compete obligation in a selective distribution system

Hellenic Competition Commission accepts commitments against concerns about restriction of parallel trade and cross-supplies between authorised distributors in the cosmetic sector

Béguelin Import (22/71)

Coty Germany (C-230/16)

L’Oréal (31/80)

AEG v. Commission (107/82)

Metro v. Commission (26/76)

Leclerc v. Commission (T-19/92)

Vichy v. Commission (T-19/91)

Ford v. Commission (interim measures) (228/82 and 229/82)

Leclerc v. Commission (T-88/92)

Javico (C-306/96)

Auto 24 (C-158/11)

Nuclear Laser Medicine / Innogenetics (C.05.0290.N)

Guess (AT.40428)

Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique (C-439/09)

Denon & Marantz (AT.40469)

Asus (AT.40465)