Distribution Law Center: Search

This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to better tailor the website to your preferences. Below you can indicate your cookie preferences:

Essential cookies are cookies that are necessary for the correct functioning of the website (e.g., to avoid overload on the website, keeping it functional and accessible). These cookies can be placed without your consent.

Functional cookies are cookies that are necessary to improve your browsing experience or to provide a functionality explicitly requested by you (e.g. remembering your settings). These cookies can also be placed without your consent.

Analytical cookies are cookies that collect information about how you use the website to improve search engine hits and the functioning of the website (e.g. we see how visitors move around the website when they are using it to ensure that visitors find what they are looking for easily). These cookies are only placed if you have given your consent.

For more information about cookies and the list of cookies used on this website, see our Cookie Statement.

Cookie preferences

Type search term(s) and press enter

18 MATCHES

Abusive conduct by distributors may be imputed to dominant producer according to Court of Justice

Tipp-Ex (IV/31.192)

Bulk Oil (174/84)

Ford v. Commission (25/84 and 26/84)

Béguelin Import (22/71)

BAI and Commission v. Bayer (C-2/01 P and C-3/01 P)

Coty Germany (C-230/16)

CEEES (C-217/05)

CEPSA (C-279/06)

L’Oréal (31/80)

AEG v. Commission (107/82)

Metro v. Commission (26/76)

Commission v. Volkswagen (C-74/04 P)

Ford v. Commission (interim measures) (228/82 and 229/82)

Javico (C-306/96)

Auto 24 (C-158/11)

Pronuptia (161/84)

Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique (C-439/09)